(no subject)
Okay, so. If you have a hit song that is re-released years later and is also a hit (possibly even a bigger hit) have you had one or two hits? And does that depend on whether it's a bigger hit the second time?
~~~
I must be doing something wrong...Sam and I were discussing boredom and I mentioned being at the movies without a book before the previews start. She said "Why would you bring a book to the movies?" I gaped at her for a moment and said "I bring a book everywhere! You know that". *sigh* ;)
But, I must be doing something right, 'cause Charlie had a great time reading to me last night. She tells a (very abridged) version of the story she can figure out from the pictures. It's freakin' adorable.
Ah, balance.
~~~
I must be doing something wrong...Sam and I were discussing boredom and I mentioned being at the movies without a book before the previews start. She said "Why would you bring a book to the movies?" I gaped at her for a moment and said "I bring a book everywhere! You know that". *sigh* ;)
But, I must be doing something right, 'cause Charlie had a great time reading to me last night. She tells a (very abridged) version of the story she can figure out from the pictures. It's freakin' adorable.
Ah, balance.
no subject
no subject
Oh, Sam. Maybe she needs a Kindle. ;)
So cute, Charlie!
Love you.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think for the Recording Arts people it might depend on whether there is any change to the recording. . .maybe. . .quite frankly, they keep changing the rules. I think a re-mix of any kind is considered as a new release. If it just a matter of a song re-entering the charts due to new interest, I'm pretty sure it is considered just that - a re-entry; same 'hit' second chart climb.
no subject
no subject